想要縮短《Journal of Arid Land》雜志的審稿周期需要作者、編輯部和審稿人等多方面的共同努力，作者可以采取一些有效措施，間接地加快審稿進(jìn)度，提升稿件的處理效率。

建議如下：

一、提高論文質(zhì)量

（1）嚴(yán)格遵循投稿要求：在投稿前，仔細(xì)閱讀《Journal of Arid Land》雜志的投稿指南，包括格式要求、字?jǐn)?shù)限制、參考文獻(xiàn)格式等。確保稿件符合雜志的規(guī)范，避免因格式問(wèn)題被退回修改，從而耽誤時(shí)間。

（2）提高論文質(zhì)量：確保論文的研究?jī)?nèi)容具有創(chuàng)新性和學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值，數(shù)據(jù)準(zhǔn)確，論證嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)，語(yǔ)言表達(dá)清晰流暢。高質(zhì)量的稿件更容易通過(guò)初審，進(jìn)入同行評(píng)審階段。

二、選擇合適的投稿時(shí)機(jī)

（1）關(guān)注期刊審稿周期：在投稿前，了解《Journal of Arid Land》雜志的審稿周期（預(yù)計(jì)1-3個(gè)月）和發(fā)表周期（雙月刊），以便合理安排投稿時(shí)間。

（2）關(guān)注期刊動(dòng)態(tài)：了解期刊的專(zhuān)題征稿或熱點(diǎn)話題，針對(duì)性地投稿，可能獲得優(yōu)先處理。

三、與編輯部保持良好溝通

（1）主動(dòng)了解審稿進(jìn)度：如果超過(guò)預(yù)計(jì)的審稿時(shí)間仍未收到回復(fù)，可以禮貌地向編輯部發(fā)送郵件，詢(xún)問(wèn)稿件的審稿進(jìn)度。

（2）尊重審稿意見(jiàn)：認(rèn)真對(duì)待審稿意見(jiàn)，積極修改論文中的不足之處，共同探討論文的改進(jìn)方向。

需要注意的是，縮短審稿周期的前提是保證稿件的質(zhì)量，不能為了追求速度而犧牲學(xué)術(shù)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)性。

《Journal of Arid Land》雜志創(chuàng)刊于2009年，是由中國(guó)科學(xué)院主管、中國(guó)科學(xué)院新疆生態(tài)與地理研究所;科學(xué)出版社主辦的學(xué)術(shù)理論雙月刊。國(guó)內(nèi)刊號(hào)CN：65-1278/K，國(guó)際刊號(hào)ISSN：1674-6767。該雜志以推動(dòng)歷史改革與發(fā)展、探索歷史規(guī)律為宗旨，致力于為歷史工作者、研究者和管理者提供一個(gè)學(xué)術(shù)交流的平臺(tái)。

《Journal of Arid Land》雜志投稿建議：

Keywords: Immediately after the abstract, provide 3 to 7 keywords, closely related to the subject of the article. Avoid general and plural terms and multiple concepts (e.g., 'and', 'of').

Introduction: Provide an adequate background. State the significance, objective and method of the research, citing necessary references, especially references of work published in the last two to three years.

Study area/materials and methods: Introducing a general idea of the study area or experimental setting, the materials and methods used and the basic progress of the study. Provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced or substantiated.

Methods already published should be indicated by a reference.

Results: Relating the findings and results of the observation(s) and experiment(s) without interpreting their meaning. Results should be clear and concise.

Discussion: Explaining all of your observations within your experiment(s). Exploring the significance of the results, but do not repeat them in the text. Stating whether each of your hypotheses are supported, rejected or if you cannot make a decision with confidence, and suggesting future studies or modifications to the same study.

Conclusions: Presenting main conclusions of the study that may stand alone or creating a discussion subsection.

Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements should include, if applicable, information on grants received, funding organizations, and/or recognition of people who assisted in the research or article.

References: Please cite a reference to acknowledge sources of information from others’ research and results. Ensure that

every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list. Citation guidelines are as follows: as (Smith, 1998) for single author, as (Smith and Miller, 1999) for two authors, and as (Smith et al., 2006) for three or more authors. Groups of references should be listed first chronologically, then alphabetically. In the reference list, references should be arranged first alphabetically, then chronologically, if necessary. More than one reference from the same author(s) in the same year must be identified by the letters "a", "b", "c", etc., placed after the year of publication. Journal names should not be abbreviated.

Reference examples:

Articles: Ames R N, Reid C P P, Porter L K, et al. 1983. Hyphal uptake and transport of nitrogen from two 15N-labelled

sources by Glomus misseae, a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytologist, 95(3): 381?396.

Monograph: Lambers H, Stuart Chapin ΙΙΙ F, Pons T L. 2008. Plant Physiological Ecology. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 56?64.

Proceedings: Bernstein N, Kafkafi U. 2002. Root growth under salinity stress. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U. Plant Roots,

the Hidden Half. New York: Marcel Dekker Press, 787?805.

Electronic reference: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 2008. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World

Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre. [2009-11-17]. 

聲明：以上內(nèi)容來(lái)源于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)公開(kāi)資料，如有不準(zhǔn)確之處，請(qǐng)聯(lián)系我們進(jìn)行修改。